There is something both exciting and unsettling about opening a new set of instructional materials. The materials are new to everyone: students, teachers, instructional coaches, principals, and district leaders. Even when some of us do have experience with similar curricula or instructional approaches, none of us has yet lived with these materials, with these students, in this context. That shared newness creates an opportunity we don’t always name: everyone is learning together.
And, this is a rare opportunity. We don’t often get to reset an entire system at the same time. In most schools and districts, people enter with different levels of experience, different histories, and different understandings of what mathematics teaching and learning should look like. New curriculum materials allows us to draw on these experiences and create a shared starting point. For a moment, everyone has something new to figure out.
What if we intentionally used that moment to build community?
When new instructional materials arrive, it can be tempting to immediately focus on implementation. Are teachers using the materials correctly? Are they following the parts of the lesson? Are they using the centers? Are students learning what they are supposed to learn? Are we enacting the materials with fidelity? Those questions matter. But before we can confidently answer them, we have to make sense of the materials ourselves.
New curriculum can make us feel vulnerable. We are investing in materials that we expect to use for many years, yet we don’t fully understand their design. We may wonder: Will these materials actually do what we hope they will? How is this lesson supposed to support student thinking? What is the purpose of the routines embedded? What should I do when students respond in ways I didn’t anticipate? Am I using the materials in the way they were designed?
It is natural to feel unsure or uncomfortable. Rather than seeing that uncertainty as a problem to overcome, what if we treated it as part of the learning process? We can be vulnerable together.
New materials give us something concrete to study and learn about together. Teachers can work through a task as learners, anticipate student strategies, consider important questions to ask students about the content, and try a routine before using it with students. Coaches can explore the lesson design alongside teachers rather than positioning themselves as the ones who already know. Principals and district leaders can learn what the materials are asking students and teachers to do and develop systems for learning to support the shifts.
And everyone can contribute. A teacher may notice something about student thinking that a coach hadn’t considered. A principal may ask a question that surfaces an important design feature of the materials. A district leader may see a connection across classrooms or grade levels. Students will show us things we could never have anticipated from simply reading the teacher’s guide. We can try things out, reflect, and learn from what happens together. We can return to the materials with new questions. We can talk about what feels different, what feels challenging, and what seems to be creating new possibilities for students. This shifts the work from implementation as compliance to implementation as collective learning.
New curriculum materials offer us more than a set of lessons to implement. They offer a shared object around which we can gather, learn, and reconnect. Perhaps the greatest affordance isn’t simply what is in the materials. It’s understanding how the materials are designed to support student learning. And that is the opportunity they create for everyone in the system to say: I don’t know yet. Let’s figure this out together.
That is a powerful place to begin.
The Evolving Educator: 
Leave a comment